small business Essay Example

small business Essay Example small business Essay small business Essay small business BY 7us3tn Contents Introduction and Background Information In our coffee shop we will produce pizza, sandwich donut, shisha, coffee, tea, Juice, donut and sweets to customer. Also service we have some service such as draw customer, give charge for telephone on every table and internet WIFI service. When we search about the location for our coffee shop we identify three locations Manama or Jidali or in Mall but we select the Jidali road because Manama not have enough barking and the mall the rent will be high. In our idea we start our business after six onth because we are studying now and we should be have lot of time to focus in sandwich and draw customer. We have some goals we need apply it in the future: Short term aims: 1 . Understand customer believe 2. Attract as we can customer. 3. Give the customer service at high quality. 4. Get good profit. Long term aims: 1 . Open new brunch when our coffee is acceptable be customer. 2. Establish image for our business and improve it. 3. Open new branch in outside of Bahrain. The cost of business is the all money we are pays it for running our business such as expenses and fixed assts. Type of cost Such as Purchase / Rent / Paid Amount (BD) Premises The workplace Rent 300 Equipment Machine (Oven, Fridge, etc ) Purchase Furniture Chairs, Tables, etc Supplies Stock purchase 1850 (for first six month) Running cost Insurance, advertising, telephone bill, Electricity Water bill Paid 4000 (for first six month) Staff Salary, insurance Paid 4500 (for first six month) We select HSBC to get loan and Tamkeen will support us to paid 50% of the interest. Because we are 4 we can get BD 20000 (5000BD for every member). Executive summary We will open coffee shop and in this coffee shop we will sell food and provide special services for our customer. In our idea the location of our business will be in Jidali and we think we can open it after six month. Our idea is creative and the customer will like our coffee shop. In our mind we need attract the customer by provide good service and get good profit. In future we need expand our business. Our business is small business we are managing the business. Of course we need the money but their things also required to running our business such as people to work to do the work. In the production process our business need machine required to running the work also need the material and employees need also for the work. The layout of the coffee shop should be arranged in suitable way and we arrange it in our own to be acceptable for all customer. For the marketing plan we select some way to attract the customer such as give coupon to special customer, all food and service free for opening day, put advertisement in newspaper and magazine and distribute the image for our business. We have clear organization structure and distribute the roles between us in the work every partner get responsibility on one department. For the financial plan we select get loan to cover the shortage and start our business with strong capital. We expect in first six month we dont have so much profit we focus on build name for our business. Description of Business We select coffee shop to Join to the market. It is success business today most of people spend their time in this place and we can take advantage of it by attract the customer in short time. Also we have new idea by provide new style sandwich and pizza in Bahrain and their drawing customer this idea our business will be more successful. As we said in the introduction we start our business after six month but before we open it we go to Jidali to see the best location in our option because the ocation is important for the business to be successful. Also we should provision request to the Ministry of Commerce for our business to give us Commercial Register. Then after we get the Commercial Register and select the location we identify the important resource to our business we should have equipment, material, energy source, financial resources, physical resources and human resources. The important resource: Equipment: We should some important machine for our business such as: For the cook activates: 2. Dishwasher 3. Meat and Chicken Cutter 4. Vegetable Cutter 5. Cooking Ovens 6. Oven-Baked Bread 7. Refrigerators Cooling 8. Blender Juice 9. Frying Potatoes 10. Frying Electric Fillet And Burger 12. The Coffee And Tea Maker 13. Ice Making Machine 14. Microwave 15. Blender Cake Some important things for the running business 2. Tables and Chairs 3. Gas Cylinders 4. Crews Of Utensils Material: We need the material to make our product. And this includes: 1. Meats 2. Chickens 3. Vegetable 4. Fruits 5. Cheese 6. Milk 7. Drinking water 8. Spices 9. Ketchup 10. Mayonnaise 11. Oil 12. salt 13. Mustard 14. Flour 15. Yeast 16. Baking Powder 17. Bicarbonate of Sodium 18. Cream 19. Eggs 20. Chocolates 21 . Flavours For Cream And Cake 2. Sugar Brown Sugar 23. Biscuits 25. Jam 26. Milk Powder 27. Starch 28. Cream Caramel 29. Custard Powder 30. Jelly 31 . Chocolate Syrup 32. Strawberry Syrup 33. Caramel Syrup 34. Semolina 35. Cappuccino Powder 36. -rea 37. Coffey 38. Butter 39. honeyed 40. Sweet Pastry Energy-source 1. Gas 2. coal 3. Water 4. Electricity Financial resources: For our business we select HSBC to get loan and Tamkeen will support us to paid 50% of the interest. Because we are 4 we can get BD 20000 (5000BD for every member). Physical resources The business need place to start and running the operation and the location of the lace should be suitable for this type of business. Because this the business need: 1 . Suitable building. 2. Car parking. 3. Toilet and washing inside the building human resources: Our business needs people to running the operation in the coffee shop. So in our business we need choose perfect and good staff to achieve the goals and success the business. The size of our business: huge capital to start this business. The small business can help us to start slowly in the market and in the time we will growth our work. Total cost of first six month: May be same this. Type of cost 2000 Number of employees required: We are four owners we will take the managing of the business and we need eight employees under us to running the work. The expected sales turnover: 2 3 4 5 6 Cash Sales 1200 1 500 1950 Production plan We have product to produce it to the customer we should have Oven-Baked Bread to break the pastry and Cooking Ovens to cook the foods to the customer because this the kitchen should have the all necessary equipment for cooking all our goods. Production program production program Sl. NO name of product total quantity production per day per month per year Special Donut Pizza 10 3600 Pizza (meat, chicken, etc 5 750 Donut sandwich 14400 Shisha 2400 28800 Coffee -rea 3000 36000 7 Large Juice 20 7200 8 Medium Juice 10800 9 Small Juice 50 18000 Donut 2700 32400 11 1800 21600 12 Crossan 65 23400 13 Chess sandwich 70 2100 25200 Physical plant layout of the coffee shop Machinery and Equipment Name and specifications of machinery Total no. required price per unit Total price name of suppliers Dish washer BHD Geant 360. 000 Meat and Chicken Cutter 500. 000 Vegetable Cutter 20. 000 Cooking Ovens 350 BHD 700. 000 Almoayyed Oven-Baked Bread BHD 500. 000 Refrigerators Cooling 220 BHD 660. 000 Lemarche Blender Juice

Sima de los Huesos, a Key to Human Evolution

Sima de los Huesos, a Key to Human Evolution The Sima de los Huesos (Pit of Bones in Spanish and typically abbreviated as SH) is a lower Paleolithic site, one of several important sections of the Cueva Mayor-Cueva del Silo cave system of the Sierra de Atapuerca in north-central Spain. With a total of at least 28 individual hominid fossils now firmly dated to 430,000 years old, SH is the largest and oldest collection of human remains yet discovered. Site Context The bone pit at Sima de los Huesos is at the bottom of the cave, beneath an abrupt vertical shaft measuring between 2-4 meters (6.5-13 feet) in diameter, and located about .5 kilometers (~1/3 of a mile) in from the Cueva Mayor entrance. That shaft extends downward approximately 13 m (42.5 ft), ending just above the Rampa (Ramp), a 9 m (30 ft) long linear chamber inclined about 32 degrees. At the foot of that ramp is deposit called the Sima de los Huesos, a smoothly oblong chamber measuring 8x4 m (26x13 ft) with irregular ceiling heights between 1-2 m (3-6.5 ft). In the roof of the eastern side of the SH chamber is another vertical shaft, which extends upwards some 5 m (16 ft) to where it is blocked by cave collapse. Human and Animal Bones The sites archaeological deposits include a bone-bearing breccia, mixed with many large fallen blocks of limestone and mud deposits. The bones are mainly composed of at least 166 Middle Pleistocene cave bears (Ursus deningeri) and at least 28 individual humans, represented by more than 6,500 bone fragments including over 500 teeth alone. Other identified animals in the pit include extinct forms of Panthera leo (lion), Felis silvestris (wildcat), Canis lupus (grey wolf), Vulpes vulpes (red fox), and Lynx pardina splaea (Pardel lynx). Relatively few of the animal and human bones are articulated; some of the bones have tooth marks from where carnivores have chewed on them. The current interpretation of how the site came to be is that all the animals and humans fell into the pit from a higher chamber and were trapped and unable to get out. The stratigraphy and layout of the bone deposit suggest  the humans were somehow deposited in the cave before the bears and other carnivores. It is also possible- given the large amount of mud in the pit- that all the bones arrived in this low place in the cave through a series of mudflows. A third and quite controversial hypothesis is that the accumulation of human remains might be the result of mortuary practices (see the discussion of Carbonell and Mosquera below). The Humans A central question for the SH site has been and continues to be who were they? Were they Neanderthal, Denisovan, Early Modern Human, some mixture we havent yet recognized? With the fossil remains of 28 individuals who all lived and died about 430,000 years ago, the SH site has the potential to teach us a great deal about human evolution and how these three populations intersected in the past. Comparisons of nine human skulls and numerous cranial fragments representing at least 13 individuals were first reported in 1997 (Arsuaga et a.). A large variety in cranial capacity and other characteristics were detailed in the publications, but in 1997, the site was thought to be about 300,000 years old, and these scholars concluded that the Sima de los Huesos population was evolutionarily related to Neanderthals as a sister group, and could best fit into the then-refined species of Homo heidelbergensis. That theory was supported by results from a somewhat controversial method redating the site to 530,000 years ago (Bischoff and colleagues, see details below). But in 2012, paleontologist Chris Stringer argued that the 530,000-year-old dates were too old, and, based on morphological attributes, the SH fossils represented an archaic form of Neanderthal, rather than H. heidelbergensis. The latest data (Arsuago et al 2014) answers some of Stringers hesitations. Mitochondrial DNA at SH Research on the cave bear bones reported by Dabney and colleagues revealed that, astonishingly, mitochondrial DNA had been preserved at the site, much older than any other found to date anywhere. Additional investigations on the human remains from SH reported by Meyer and colleagues  redated the site to closer to 400,000 years ago. These studies also supply the surprising notion that the SH population shares some DNA with the  Denisovans, rather than the Neanderthals they look like (and, of course, we dont really know what a Denisovan looks like yet). Arsuaga and colleagues reported a study of 17 complete skulls from SH, agreeing with Stringer that, because of numerous Neanderthal-like characteristics of the crania and mandibles, the population does not fit the  H. heidelbergensis  classification. But the population is, according to the authors, significantly different from other groups such as those at Ceprano and  Arago  caves, and from other Neanderthals, and Arsuaga and colleagues now argue that a separate taxon should be considered for the SH fossils. Sima de los Huesos is now dated to 430,000 years ago, and that places it close to the age predicted for when the split in hominid species creating the Neanderthal and Denisovan lineages occurred. The SH fossils are thus central to the investigations concerning how that might have happened, and what our evolutionary history might be. Sima de los Huesos, a Purposeful Burial Mortality profiles (Bermudez de Castro and colleagues) of the SH population show a high representation of adolescents and prime-age adults  and a low percentage of adults between 20 and 40 years of age. Only one individual was under 10 at the time of death, and none were over 40-45 years old. Thats confusing, because, while 50% of the bones were gnaw-marked, they were in fairly good condition: statistically, say the scholars, there should be more children. Carbonell and Mosquera (2006) argued that Sima de los Huesos represents a purposeful burial, based partly on the recovery of a single quartzite  Acheulean handaxe  (Mode 2) and the complete lack of lithic waste or other habitation waste at all. If they are correct, and they are currently in the minority, Sima de los Huesos would be the earliest example of purposeful human burials known to date, by ~200,000 years or so. Evidence suggesting that at least one of the individuals in the pit died as a result of interpersonal violence was reported in 2015 (Sala et al. 2015). Cranium 17 has multiple impact fractures which occurred near the moment of death, and scholars believe this individual was dead at the time s/he was dropped into the shaft. Sala et al. argue that placing cadavers into the pit was indeed a social practice of the community.   Dating Sima de lost Huesos Uranium-series and Electron Spin Resonance dating of the human fossils reported in 1997 indicated a minimum age of about 200,000 and a probable age of greater than 300,000 years ago, which roughly matched the age of the mammals. In 2007, Bischoff and colleagues reported that a high-precision thermal-ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) analysis defines the minimum of deposits age as 530,000 years ago. This date led researchers to postulate that the SH hominids were at the beginning of the  Neanderthal  evolutionary lineage, rather than a contemporary, related sister group. However, in 2012, paleontologist Chris Stringer argued that, based on morphological attributes, the SH fossils represent an archaic form of Neanderthal, rather than  H. heidelbergensis, and that the 530,000-year-old date is too old. In 2014, excavators Arsuaga et al reported new dates from a suite of different dating techniques, including Uranium series (U-series) dating of speleothems, thermally transferred  optically stimulated luminescence  (TT-OSL) and post-infrared stimulated luminescence (pIR-IR) dating of sedimentary quartz and feldspar grains, electron spin resonance (ESR) dating of sedimentary quartz, combined ESR/U-series dating of fossil teeth, paleomagnetic analysis of sediments, and biostratigraphy. Dates from most of these techniques clustered around 430,000 years ago. Archaeology The first human fossils were discovered in 1976, by T. Torres, and the first excavations within this unit were conducted by the Sierra de Atapuerca Pleistocene site group under the direction of E. Aguirre. In 1990, this program was undertaken by J. L. Arsuaga, J. M. Bermudez de Castro, and E. Carbonell. Sources Arsuaga JL, Martà ­nez I, Gracia A, Carretero JM, Lorenzo C, Garcà ­a N, and Ortega AI. 1997.  Sima de los Huesos (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). The site.  Journal of Human Evolution  33(2–3):109-127. Arsuaga JL, Martà ­nez, Gracia A, and Lorenzo C. 1997a.  The Sima de los Huesos crania (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). A comparative study.  Journal of Human Evolution  33(2–3):219-281. Arsuaga JL, Martà ­nez I, Arnold LJ, Aranburu A, Gracia-Tà ©llez A, Sharp WD, Quam RM, Falguà ¨res C, Pantoja-Pà ©rez A, Bischoff JL et al. . 2014.  Neandertal roots: Cranial and chronological evidence from Sima de los Huesos.  Science  344(6190):1358-1363. doi: 10.1126/science.1253958 Bermà ºdez de Castro JM, Martinà ³n-Torres M, Lozano M, Sarmiento S, and Muelo A. 2004.  Paleodemography of the Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos Hominin Sample: A revision and new appropaches to the paleodemongraphy of the European Middle Pleistocene population.  Journal of Anthropological Research  60(1):5-26. Bischoff JL, Fitzpatrick JA, Leà ³n L, Arsuaga JL, Falgueres C, Bahain JJ, and Bullen T. 1997.  Geology and preliminary dating of the hominid-bearing sedimentary fill of the Sima de los Huesos Chamber, Cueva Mayor of the Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain.  Journal of Human Evolution  33(2–3):129-154. Bischoff JL, Williams RW, Rosenbauer RJ, Aramburu A, Arsuaga JL, Garcà ­a N, and Cuenca-Bescà ³s G. 2007.  High-resolution U-series dates from the Sima de  Ã‚  Journal of Archaeological Science  34(5):763-770.los  Huesos hominids yields : implications for the evolution of the early Neanderthal lineage. Carbonell E, and Mosquera M. 2006.  The emergence of  a  symbolic   Comptes Rendus Palevol  5(1–2):155-160.behaviour: the  sepulchral pit of  Sima de  los  Huesos, Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain. Carretero J-M, Rodrà ­guez L, Garcà ­a-Gonzlez R, Arsuaga J-L, Gà ³mez-Olivencia A, Lorenzo C, Bonmatà ­ A, Gracia A, Martà ­nez I, and Quam R. 2012.  Stature estimation from complete long bones in the Middle Pleistocene humans from the Sima de  los  Huesos, Sierra de Atapuerca (Spain).  Journal of Human Evolution  62(2):242-255. Dabney J, Knapp M, Glocke I, Gansauge M-T, Weihmann A, Nickel B, Valdiosera C, Garcà ­a N, Pbo S, Arsuaga J-L et al. 2013.  Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  110(39):15758-15763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314445110 Garcà ­a N, and Arsuaga JL. 2011.  The Sima de  Ã‚  Quaternary Science Reviews  30(11-12):1413-1419.los  Huesos (Burgos, northern Spain): palaeoenvironment and habitats of Homo heidelbergensis during the Middle Pleistocene. Garcà ­a N, Arsuaga JL, and Torres T. 1997.  The carnivore remains from the Sima de  Ã‚  Journal of Human Evolution  33(2–3):155-174.los  Huesos Middle Pleistocene site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). Gracia-Tà ©llez A, Arsuaga J-L, Martà ­nez I, Martà ­n-Francà ©s L, Martinà ³n-Torres M, Bermà ºdez de Castro J-M, Bonmatà ­ A, and Lira J. 2013.  Orofacial pathology in Homo heidelbergensis: The case of Skull 5 from the Sima de los Huesos site (Atapuerca, Spain).  Quaternary International  295:83-93. Hublin J-J. 2014.  How to build a Neandertal.  Science  344(6190):1338-1339. doi: 10.1126/science.1255554 Martinà ³n-Torres M, Bermà ºdez de Castro JM, Gà ³mez-Robles A, Prado-Simà ³n L, and Arsuaga JL. 2012.  Morphological description and comparison of the dental remains from Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos site (Spain).  Journal of Human Evolution  62(1):7-58. Meyer, Matthias. A mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos. Nature volume 505, Qiaomei Fu, Ayinuer Aximu-Petri, et al., Springer Nature Publishing AG, January 16, 2014. Ortega AI, Benito-Calvo A, Pà ©rez-Gonzlez A, Martà ­n-Merino MA, Pà ©rez-Martà ­nez R, Parà ©s JM, Aramburu A, Arsuaga JL, Bermà ºdez de Castro JM, and Carbonell E. 2013.  Evolution of multilevel caves in the Sierra de Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain) and its relation to human occupation.  Geomorphology  196:122-137. Sala N, Arsuaga JL, Pantoja-Pà ©rez A, Pablos A, Martà ­nez I, Quam RM, Gà ³mez-Olivencia A, Bermà ºdez de Castro JM, and Carbonell E. 2015.  Lethal Interpersonal Violence in the Middle Pleistocene.  PLoS ONE  10(5):e0126589. Stringer C. 2012.  The status of Homo heidelbergensis (Schoetensack 1908).  Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews  21(3):101-107.

American History Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

American History - Essay Example These images have a significant influence on the way students and historians perceive their past (Chrestien, 104). This paper evaluates a number of primary sources that accrue to the history of the first Americans while relating the sources in terms of their contributions to the current written history. In 1926, George McJunkin, an African-American cowboy, made a discovery that hugely changed the perception towards North America’s first natives (Johnson, 31). He spotted bleached bones while tracking lost cattle near Folsom, New Mexico but the bones were later found to belong to a bison species extinct for more than 10,000 years (Johnson, 33). The talk point of the discovery was the spearheads made of stone by humans found mixed with the bones, which meant that Indian ancestry could be traced back to thousands of years before the time thought by most of the 20th century authorities. As Johnson (48) asserts, the first Europeans who inhabited America in the 15th century believed that this was the new world but this discovery disapproved them as it was established that more that 20,000 years before, there were inhabitants in the area. There exist no documented records to affirm that diversity of societies in early America thrived, although the differences in cultural practices and languages were enough proof. In order to reshape this history, Johnson (66) believes that one has to look at the various primary sources of information, mainly archeological artifacts, which record the past behaviors of the humans. A wide range of artifacts that includes basket snippets, pottery fragments, oral traditions, discarded tools/ equipment, and food remains have been used by archeologists, anthropologists and historians to put together relevant pieces of information about the social organization, diet, and technology of these people and the changes they have gone through over time. In the 16th century, Chrestien (105) argues that Europeans believed that Indians originated from the Lost Tribes of Israel with reference to the Bible, while others associated their ancestry with the myth of the lost continent of Atlantis while another suggestion came from a Spanish missionary (Jose de Acosta) that the Indians are part of the small group of hunters that was driven away from their Asian homes by starvation and other hardships. The notion that America’s first habitats came from Asia is supported by physical anthropology. American natives and people of northeast Asia have common physical traits that form a strong line of evidence that North America was inhabited by Indians. These physical traits include (Johnson, 101); i. Straight black hair. ii. Wide cheekbones. iii. Shovel-shaped incisors. iv. Dark brown eyes. Bering Strait, which currently separates Siberia and Alaska, has been believed to be the area used by America’s pioneers to cross into North America (Johnson, 121). According to Johnson (122), this took place around 25,000 to 70,000 yea rs ago during one of the ice ages where large volumes of water froze into glaciers creating a land bridge between Alaska and Siberia. The land bridge is believed to have appeared twice; between 26,000 and 28, 000 years ago, and between 10,000-12,000 and 20,000 years ago (Johnson, 145). It is during this period that authorities believe Indians came into America as they followed the migratory patterns of animals which were their major source of food with the aid of the Beringia (the land bridge formed from the frozen waters) (Chrestien, 105).

Response Journal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Response Journal - Essay Example The explosion also killed 11 people instantly leaving several others seriously injured and in addition to blackening the Gulf coast (Taylor par. 2). It is two years since the disaster occurred and its devastating effects are still being felt. Experts reveal that all oil, approximated at about five million barrels, leaked spreading from the coast of Mexico to Florida. Houston is arguably the place that felt most of impacts of the incident which affected mainly wildlife and the environment, thereby raising ethical issues (Taylor par. 4). The main ethical problems present in this situation were to do with the destruction of the environment and wildlife by humans in the Gulf of Mexico and its environs. For instance, environmentalists reveal that the spill interfered with aquatic life as several marine animals were killed as a result. The other ethical issue that arose is that BP and its subcontractors were only concerned with cost saving without adequately assessing the hazardous risks. This in itself becomes unethical issue since BP concentrated only on cost saving and failing to put measures in place to ensure that their drilling processes were safe. The BP oil spill is also seen as an ethical issue for the reason that the company failed to minimize the impacts of the disaster for all those who were affected. The spill interfered with businesses and coastal beaches that are dependent on fishing and tourism. Furthermore, the oil spill was not only a health concern for residents of Houston but also to coastal businesses that lost millions of dollars due to the disaster. Oil that spilled underwater also affected all the aquatic animals throughout the gulf raising ethical concerns (Taylor par.6). In conclusion, the BP oil spill problem seems to have been caused by negligence on the parts of engineering who were building the deep-water horizon. To solve this problem, BP should always adhere to ethical practice when handling

Response Journal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Response Journal - Essay Example The explosion also killed 11 people instantly leaving several others seriously injured and in addition to blackening the Gulf coast (Taylor par. 2). It is two years since the disaster occurred and its devastating effects are still being felt. Experts reveal that all oil, approximated at about five million barrels, leaked spreading from the coast of Mexico to Florida. Houston is arguably the place that felt most of impacts of the incident which affected mainly wildlife and the environment, thereby raising ethical issues (Taylor par. 4). The main ethical problems present in this situation were to do with the destruction of the environment and wildlife by humans in the Gulf of Mexico and its environs. For instance, environmentalists reveal that the spill interfered with aquatic life as several marine animals were killed as a result. The other ethical issue that arose is that BP and its subcontractors were only concerned with cost saving without adequately assessing the hazardous risks. This in itself becomes unethical issue since BP concentrated only on cost saving and failing to put measures in place to ensure that their drilling processes were safe. The BP oil spill is also seen as an ethical issue for the reason that the company failed to minimize the impacts of the disaster for all those who were affected. The spill interfered with businesses and coastal beaches that are dependent on fishing and tourism. Furthermore, the oil spill was not only a health concern for residents of Houston but also to coastal businesses that lost millions of dollars due to the disaster. Oil that spilled underwater also affected all the aquatic animals throughout the gulf raising ethical concerns (Taylor par.6). In conclusion, the BP oil spill problem seems to have been caused by negligence on the parts of engineering who were building the deep-water horizon. To solve this problem, BP should always adhere to ethical practice when handling

Darwin's Rib by Robert S. Root-Bernstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Darwin's Rib by Robert S. Root-Bernstein - Essay Example The present research has identified that a student declares that males have one fewer pair of ribs than women, based on the Biblical assertion that God took a rib from Adam to create Eve. This paper illustrates that in order to support the fact of biological evolution; Root-Bernstein employs evidence and reason. Firstly, he cites the proven failure of the Lamarckian theory of inheritance. Egg cells, containing unalterable genetic information, are formed before birth, and somatic modifications cannot be inherited by offspring. The researcher states that on this basis, men can only have the normal number of ribs, irrespective of whether God removed one of Adam’s ribs. Secondly, as ribs are not a sex-linked characteristic, there is no reason for males and females to differ in this aspect. Sexual dimorphism is not necessary for ribs. Professor Robert S. Root-Bernstein, in line with his belief in religious freedom, goes on to reason that the above scientific evidence does not neces sarily contradict religious beliefs. From the research, it can be comprehended that Professor Robert S. Root-Bernstein reasons that the Bible does not specify the number of ribs Adam initially had. From the research, it can be comprehended that there is no biblical basis to infer that Adam had the same number of ribs as modern humans and that his male descendants should be short of a rib after God removed a rib from Adam.  

The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock - Essay Example "No experience," asserts Bradley in a phrase that Eliot states, "can lie open to inspections from outside" (Rampal, 203). Prufrocks dream is incommunicable, and whatsoever he speaks to the lady is answered by, "That is not what I meant at all. That is not it, at all" (CP, 6). The lady is also trapped in her own domain, and the two domains can never, alike soap bubbles, turn into one. Each domain is impassable to the other. If other consciousnesses occur only as opaque matters for Prufrock, he possess an equally unhappy relativity to space and time. One of the poem puzzles is the question of whether Prufrock leaves his room ever. It seems that he does not, hence infirm is his determination, so prepared "for a hundred indecisions, And for hundred visions and revisions, Before the taking of a toast and tea" (CP, 4). In another notion Prufrock would be incapable of going anywhere, no matter how hard he tried. However far the author goes, he remains caged in his own individual space, and all he is experiencing is imaginary. It appears to be some opinion of this which makes him stay in his room, gratified to imagine himself walking through the streets, climbing the ladys stairs, and saying to the lady "all like Lazarus from the dead†. There remains no resurrection from death which has unfastened him, and this is an implication of the Dante epigraph. But time, just like space, has only subjective existence for Prufrock. Consequently, future, present, and past are equally immediate, and the author is paralyzed. As a Bradleys finite centers asserts, he "is not in time," hence "contains [his] own past and future" (Rampal, 205). Memories, ironic reverberations of earlier poetry, current sensations, anticipations of what the author might do in future ("I grow old . . . I grow old . . . I shall wear my trousers bottoms rolled" (Rampal, 71) - which are equally present. Like the women